Sunday, November 23, 2025

ZZ25065 Starlink V01 231125

 How Starlink is rewiring the planet

From UK farms to the front line in Ukraine, Elon Musk connects the world — but what about the space junk, asks Danny Fortson

When Alex Leiserach and his wife moved from West Sussex to a farmhouse in the Lincolnshire countryside, they knew it would be a big life change. What they did not expect was to travel back in time to when web connections were so slow that pages would appear to download pixel by pixel. “It was like dial-up internet,” said the 42-year-old. “If my wife and I both wanted to send an email, one of us would have to wait.”

A promised fibre connection under Project Gigabit — the government’s £5 billion plan, launched in April 2021, to connect 99 per cent of British households to broadband internet — was years away, so instead Leiserach joined the customer ranks of Starlink, the space-based internet business of Elon Musk’s $350 billion (£270 billion) rocket company SpaceX.

For £75 per month (and £299 for the dish), he gets enough bandwidth beamed from satellites orbiting 340 miles above the Earth’s surface to run The Layby Lincs, the glamping business he and his wife have set up on their property.

“There could potentially be our five units in the garden, plus us, streaming video at the same time — and we’ve never noticed anything buffer,” he said.

Tales like this illuminate one of the most extraordinary business stories unfolding in the world today. With Starlink, Musk is rapidly building a new layer of global infrastructure that offers an alternative to the messy traditional approach: digging up roads and laying thousands of miles of fibreoptic cable.

Instead, through SpaceX he has launched nearly 9,000 internet-beaming satellites into orbit, which have opened up the prospect of bringing online the 2 billion-plus people globally who, the World Economic Forum estimates, are still without internet access.

Starlink this month hit 8 million paying customers, from the 2.3 million it had at the start of 2024. Sales last year leapt to an estimated $7.7 billion, surpassing the fees paid by governments and companies to hitch a ride on SpaceX rockets. And as its launch cadence grows — SpaceX now fires a rocket into orbit roughly every other day — so too does Starlink’s constellation.

SpaceX adds about 12 satellites per launch, filling out a network that provides internet access almost anywhere — from the turrets of medieval castles in England to deep-sea fishing vessels in the North Pacific to, as of next year, the entire fleet of British Airways passenger jets.

Jonathan McDonnell, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Massachusetts, said: “Starlink is starting to deliver on [Musk’s] promise of ubiquitous broadband internet for everyone.”

Steve Durkin, founder of Rutland Broadband, installs Starlink for farmers and other customers who have been waiting years for the rural broadband initiatives promised by successive governments.

Ofcom, the UK industry regulator, estimates that 3 per cent of Britons over the age of 16 — 1.3 million people — do not have internet access.

Durkin said: “The rural community absolutely needs the internet. Pretty much every piece of farm equipment these days is connected, and they run sophisticated agronomy systems, field analysis and all the science behind optimising crops. There’s no good alternative ... Starlink has been a game-changer.”

The idea for Starlink began in the mind of Elon Musk. Obsessed with making humans “interplanetary” by colonising Mars, he recycled $100 million he made from the sale of PayPal to eBay in 2002 to design, from scratch, a reusable rocket that could theoretically be orders of magnitude cheaper than other rocket systems in use at the time.

It was, on the face of it, an insane idea.

Governments, not private companies, built rockets — and certainly not companies run by someone with zero experience in spaceflight. “We started off with just a few people who really didn’t know how to make rockets,” Musk once said of the early days of SpaceX.

Its first three rockets failed, pushing the company to the edge of bankruptcy.

“Fortunately, the fourth launch — the last money we had for Falcon 1 — worked. Or that would have been it for SpaceX.”

Today, the Falcon 9 — the ninth iteration of that first rocket — is the workhorse of the fleet. Every two and a half days, one of them blasts off from Florida or California ferrying all manner of hardware to space, from satellites and GPS kit to supplies for Nasa’s International Space Station.

The breakthrough was making the booster reusable. Before SpaceX, rockets were artisanal. Each booster would deliver a single payload to orbit then detach, crash into the ocean and never be seen again. The ability to not just control a descent, but direct the rocket to land with pinpoint accuracy, was deemed simply too hard.

But SpaceX, after many misfires, has mastered the technology. The upshot is that it has brought down launch costs by a factor of ten, allowing it to grab most of the market, while also spawning a generation of start-ups whose business models are enabled by the suddenly cheap cost of getting their equipment into orbit.

The other reason for satellite internet’s boom is the level of orbit. Previous providers operated from 22,000 miles above the Earth, resulting in lags that limited their utility. Signals from Starlink in “low Earth orbit” of about 340 miles have far shorter distances to travel, resulting in speeds akin to terrestrial internet.

Adecade ago, about 1,200 working satellites orbited the Earth; today there are 12,000, most of which are Musk’s. If the 54-year-old billionaire and his rivals, including Amazon Leo, the online retailer’s nascent satellite internet service, deliver on their plans, there could be more than 100,000 satellites circling the globe by 2035.

The implications could be profound.

The last dark corners of the planet would be lit up — but it would also concentrate even more power in the hands of the world’s richest man.

A fault in September briefly cut service across the network — from the front line of the Russia-Ukraine war, where Kyiv’s military relies on Starlink, to Leiserach’s Lincolnshire business — highlighting what a critical lever Starlink has become on the world stage.

The amount of kit being put into orbit also increases the risk of catastrophe. Satellites circle the globe at 17,000 miles per hour. A collision could set off a chain reaction that sends shrapnel hurtling through space, destroying other satellites and rendering swathes of orbit unusable.

This could affect everything from bank transactions to climate-change monitoring.

As McDonnell puts it, “The Earth economy is now strongly entangled with the space economy.”

SpaceX and its rivals regularly “deorbit” satellites, lowering them at the end of their useful life to be incinerated by the atmosphere. “We could see 20 satellites re-entering a day, and each of these satellites is like half a tonne,” McDonnell said.

“So you’re adding many tonnes of metal a day, in multiple forms, to the upper atmosphere. We know that will have an effect on atmospheric chemistry.”

For most, however, the ability to tap into high-speed internet outweighs such concerns. When Simon Burton, 66, a retired tech worker, moved to the West Country village of Kingsdown, he tested the speed of the existing service. It was bad: 21 megabits per second (Mbps).

BT Openreach said there were no plans to lay fibre for at least 12 months.

“I’ve been a BT customer all my life, so I have massive loyalty. But the obvious answer was Starlink,” he said.

Yet even the service’s most loyal customers are wary of being so reliant on Musk, whose behaviour has become increasingly erratic in recent years. Leiserach said: “You’re at Starlink’s mercy.

No one likes a monopoly.”

Right now, however, it is the only option he’s got.

Friday, November 7, 2025

ZZ25064 China’s Area 51. V01 081125

 China offers a glimpse of its latest jet as confidence replaces stealth


Michael Evans

The J-36 is thought to have three engines and a vast weapons bay

In a scorched and sand-blasted salt lake on the fringes of the Gobi desert barely a month seems to go by without a new building going up and more tarmac being laid. It’s a busy time to be at Lop Nur, China’s secret test base.

Observers of satellite images of the facility, however, were startled by what they saw there in August and September. On one day of each month a supposedly secret stealth jet sat in the afternoon sun at the base in the remotest corner of remote Xinjiang known as China’s equivalent to America’s Area 51.

The delta-winged J-36 and the smaller J-XDS (also known as J-50) are not yet operational but are expected to compete with the best US fighter jets.

Lop Nur has what is thought to be the world’s longest runway, at more than three miles long. Run by the People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF), it is where it can launch the equivalent of US Air Force “black” (classified) test flights.

The CIA’s U-2 spy plane and the US Air Force’s first stealth fighter, the F-117 Nighthawk, were test-flown at Area 51, for example. In Nevada, notices near the perimeter of Area 51 warn that it is a restricted base and that guards are authorised to use “deadly force” against trespassers. Lop Nur warns simply that anyone trying to steal secrets “will be killed”. Like Area 51, it is prohibited to fly over Lop Nur. But both bases can be photographed by satellites.

Why, then, would the Chinese military have its latest jets out on the tarmac where they can clearly be seen?

Douglas Barrie, an aerospace specialist at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said: “Leaving these aircraft out in the open means the Chinese don’t mind them being spotted by passing satellites. It’s a way of showing off what they’ve got, even though Lop Nur base could well be described as an Area 51.”

The J-36 and J-XDS are part of what the Pentagon says is China’s ambition to challenge US air power in the Indo- Pacific. The J-36 is believed by US intelligence to have been designed to coordinate drones in a swarming attack, similar in concept to the Pentagon’s Loyal Wingman programme in which drones would fly alongside American F-35 stealth fighters.

Lop Nur is just one of several remote bases where the PLAAF is developing and testing a next-generation fleet of combat fighters, bombers and attack drones. The military parade in Beijing in September included an unmanned stealth fighter — the largest drone on display — although it could have been a mock-up rather than a fully formed aircraft. While China’s most advanced drones under development are being tested at other bases, including Malan in the Xinjiang region, and at a highaltitude testing site at Ngari in Tibet, key flight tests of the J-36 and J-XDS appear to be taking place at Lop Nur.

“But there are plenty of other things which we know they are developing but have never been seen, such as a subsonic, low observable stealth bomber. That’s hidden away,” Barrie said, adding that China now had “military aircraft which are broadly comparable with the US, but the one thing they don’t have is combat experience. The last war they fought was in the 1970s in Vietnam

Monday, November 3, 2025

ZZ25063 The Semi Conductor Battle V01 041125

 Nexperia drama is a lesson in the politics of semiconductors


Katie Prescott

It is now more than a month since the Dutch took control of the Chinese-owned semiconductor business Nexperia, invoking Cold War emergency powers to protect supply chains. So much for stereotypes of tulips and tolerance.

The Dutch government cited “serious governance shortcomings” in the Netherlands-headquartered business under the leadership of Zhang Xuezheng, chief executive and billionaire founder of Wingtech, its ultimate Chinese parent.

European executives turned on him for allegedly misusing company funds, something the Shanghai-listed electronics company strongly denies.

Xuezheng was ousted and the Dutch government has banned Nexperia from making any big decisions without its approval for a year.

The goal was to make sure Nexperia’s products remained available, to protect the Dutch and European economies. Instead, this extraordinary action has had the opposite effect, leading to a schism with Beijing and causing chaos in European carmaking, as China halted shipments of Nexperia products to the continent.

This is no Nvidia, making specialist AI processors, but Nexperia’s more basic chips are fundamental to many electronics, such as in cars for power-steering, in smartphones and smoke detectors.

The company employs 12,500 people and has turnover of about $2 billion.Originally a spin-off from Philips under the name NXP, it was taken over by Wingtech in 2019.

In a story which raises more questions than it answers, this all underlines how fiercely politicised semiconductors have become.

Domestic control of companies is considered as important as their location. Emphasis on “sovereignty”, the tech buzzword of 2025, is becoming stronger. Europe makes only about 10 per cent of the world’s semiconductors, it is vulnerable to shortages and it desperately needs its own supply.

This is also the latest example of supply chains being weaponised, as governments use control over chip technology as leverage in diplomacy and geopolitics.

Most of the flashpoints to date have been between the US andChina. This opens up a new front in the confrontation with Beijing.

National security concerns may not have been mentioned in the Dutch business court dealing with this case, but outside of it they are being widely discussed.

Wingtech was placed on a US official watch list in 2024, because it was said to be involved in helping the Chinese government’s efforts “to acquire entities with sensitive semiconductor manufacturing capability critical to the defence industrial bases of the United States and its allies”. In September this year the watchlist was widened to cover any company at least 50 per cent owned by one of the companies already on it: enter Nexperia and that Dutch decision.

In March 2022 the Commons foreign affairs select committee claimed that Wingtech was heavily backed by the Chinese Communist Party, citing Chinese investment screening specialists Datenna.

In fact, Times readers may remember Nexperia. Concerns were raised when it bought a chip factory in South Wales in 2021. A year later the government forced Nexperia to sell Newport Wafer Fab under national security legislation, citing its proximity to other semiconductor plants and its potential to develop sophisticated chips.

The word “China” was not mentioned in the short Final Order notice but it did not need to be.

As the stand-off with Nexperia continues in Europe, the British government faces a conundrum.

Nexperia may have sold Newport but it also has a plant in Stockport called Hazel Grove. There are now calls by China hawks here for a review of its ownership.

A chip chasm is growing between the West and China, and analysts are talking about the creation of a “dual semiconductor ecosystem”.

As the car companies are experiencing, Nexperia encapsulates just how complex global chip supply chains make companies vulnerable.

Under their chips acts, the EU and the US are spending billions to bring semiconductor production back to their shores. It is going to be a slow and painful process.

Katie Prescott is Technology Business Editor of The Times

ZZ25062 Getty and Shutterstick Merger V01 041125

Getty and Shutterstock deal scrutinised

Guy Taylor

 A merger between two of the world’s largest photo licensing platforms will face a deeper investigation from Britain’s competition authority amid concerns it could lead to higher prices and lower quality images for customers.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said Getty Images and Shutterstock had offered a “complex package of remedies at a late stage” of the first phase of its inquiry, but these “did not fully address its concerns”.

Getty announced plans to take over its stock-photo rival Shutterstock in January in a deal that would create a business with combined revenues of more than £3 billion. Customers of the two companies include major media groups, publishers and advertisers, as well as small and medium-sized businesses in the creative sector.

The CMA said it had heard widespread concerns from business, trade associations and other stakeholders about the potential impact of the takeover on the supply of editorial and stock content, including from the News Media Association, which represents around 900 titles in the UK.

The first phase of its inquiry considered the deal’s implications for editorial content, such as pictures and videos of newsworthy people and events, and stock images, which are existing photos licensed out for commercial purposes.

The CMA will now conduct a more in-depth phase 2 inquiry, with a final decision to be made by April 19.

Shares in Getty, which is listed in New York, declined more than 5 per cent yesterday, while Shutterstock fell nearly 10 per cent. Both companies have faced a downturn in demand for stock images following the rise of mobile cameras.

Getty, which is based in Washington, said it was “disappointed” by the regulator’s decision but remained committed to the proposed merger